
Coming soon
Cost-effective technologies to reduce emissions from existing energy and industrial infrastructure could play an important role in achieving stabilization targets for CO2e emissions. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies are a set of potentially viable options for mitigating CO2e from power plants if costs come down.
Cost-effective technologies to reduce emissions from existing energy and industrial infrastructure could play an important role in achieving stabilization targets for CO2e emissions. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies are a set of potentially viable options for mitigating CO2e from power plants if costs come down.
Current global emissions from the energy sector are 30 billion tons of CO2e annually, or 60% of anthropogenic emissions, and projected to grow by 20%. Low-carbon energy infrastructure is critical to reduce emissions and avoid dangerous climate change. A modern fossil-fuel burning power plant outfitted with CCS capability could achieve as much as 80% to 90% reduction in CO2e emissions compared to a plant without CCS, according to the IPCC.
The cost of CCS is currently high and remains prohibitive without incentive measures. This cost is largely associated with additional energy requirements to operate the CCS system. Adding CCS capabilities to a coal-fired power plant would increase the fuel needs by 25% to 40% according to the IPCC. An ideally sited new-build coal plant with the technology would add 1.8 to 3.4 cents per kWh over the base cost of 0.9 to 2.2 cents per kWh for a plant without the capture and storage capability. Policy measures to support adoption include direct measures such as tax incentives for CCS or indirect measures such as a price on carbon. A direct incentive program would have to consider tradeoffs between funding for other available mitigation technologies.
Investment in research, development, and deployment of CCS technologies is needed to eliminate technology risk and bring down cost. Significant emissions reductions on the order of several billion of tons of CO2e annually would be achievable by 2020 if CCS can scale; market adoption will depend strongly on costs.
Investment in research, development, and deployment of CCS technologies is needed to eliminate technology risk and bring down cost. Significant emissions reductions on the order of several billion of tons of CO2e annually would be achievable by 2020 if CCS can scale; market adoption will depend strongly on costs.
The IPCC estimates that capture and storage could account for 15% to 44% of total CO2e emissions reductions to reach stabilization scenarios.
Some of the investment in CCS will need to come from public funds due to long deployment times that will dissuade private investors. The benefits of the investment include reduced emissions (both CO2e and other air pollutants) through the use of CCS and a potentially lucrative technology in the presence of a carbon market.
Market-based Approaches
If costs can be brought down through support for research, development, and early deployment, then the CCS technology could be competitive in a carbon market. If costs come down, reductions in air pollution (not just CO2e) could lead to adoption to comply with standards or satisfy consumers. Consumers and policymakers may advocate the use of the technology by utilities. A high enough price on carbon would support a market for CCS and attract private investment into the technology.

Electricity produced from burning fossil fuels releases harmful air pollution as well as CO2e that is leading to dangerous climate change. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) sequesters these...
Read more >
Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies store the harmful emissions deep in the ground or under water. The technology is still years away from commercial deployment. ...
Image...
Read more >Sarah Forbes, a World Resources Institute Senior Associate, explains carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology--and the challenges of implementing CCS at full-scale.
Read more >
The process of carbon capture and sequestration requires additional energy in the production process. However, even accounting for the additional energy, the net carbon emissions are lower with...
Read more > Source: IPCC, 2003